An argument is considered sound if:
It is valid: The conclusion logically follows from the premises.
Analysis of the argument
Premises:
I generally don’t enjoy company.
This is a subjective statement based on personal experience and is true as I genuinely feel this way.
I like to be alone.
Again, this is a personal preference and can be true based on my feelings.
Happiness doesn’t depend on company.
This premise can be debated philosophically. Many argue that happiness can be independent of social interactions, while others believe social connections are crucial for happiness. Its truth may vary from person to person.
I like physical closeness to women.
This is a personal preference and can be true if it reflects my feelings.
I don’t want women as friends.
This is also subjective and can be true based on my personal choices.
It’s best for me to be friendly to males but neither seek nor need friendship.
This premise reflects a personal stance and can be true if it aligns with my behaviour.
It’s best for me to use transactional dating or celibacy for any physical needs.
This is a personal decision and can be true if it reflects my intentions.
Conclusion:
My conclusion is that I prefer to avoid company, do not seek friendships, and will manage physical needs through transactional dating or celibacy.
Validity of the Argument
The argument is valid in that the conclusion logically follows from the premises. I do not enjoy company, do not seek friendships, and have a specific approach to physical needs, it makes sense to conclude that I will remain outside of traditional social structures.
Truth of the Premises
The truth of the premises is subjective and relies on my personal beliefs and experiences. If all the premises accurately reflect my views and feelings, then the argument is sound.
Conclusion
If the premises are true for me, then the argument is sound. Overall, the argument is logically coherent and reflects a clear personal philosophy.